incantation Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 Spears of grass, do tears That fall for A male lover have a different Mass, can they be shaped From within. Dialogue between Nature and art, spirit and flesh. Walt Whitman had his hands On two different mirrors, arc of Swan's uplift reflected on water. Move towards perfection In his work and male Companions. Unresting Ballet of a poet's senses. Can tear with image of Lost lover be recalled Who painted Michelangelo's Dream within the tear. Love without boundaries. Organic as The compost Walt wrote about, Natural as daylight that Astonished him. Michelangelo Created an aesthetic of Male beauty in sculpture As vigorous as the calamus. Panopticon of time's dance With dreams. Expansions through brush, pen, Intimacy of men. Celebration Of the male body, union. Moon of ice Passes over waterfall of fire Definitions of desire alter imperceptibly. An earth shivers agents Out of conformity nothing Can prevent gravity from Being delivered. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terry A Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 Just for the record: From Wiki- In 1890, Symonds wrote to Whitman: "In your conception of Comradeship, do you contemplate the possible intrusion of those semi-sexual emotions and actions which no doubt do occur between men?" In reply, Whitman denied that his work had any such implication, asserting "[T]hat the calamus part has even allow'd the possibility of such construction as mention'd is terrible—I am fain to hope the pages themselves are not to be even mention'd for such gratuitous and quite at this time entirely undream'd & unreck'd possibility of morbid inferences—wh' are disavow'd by me and seem damnable" In Whitman's time he took the stance most necessary to being allowed inclusion in public life. Many post-modern writers have blurred the line between what is art and what is pornography thinking the "edginess" gives them a one-up on the more gently treatments such questions raise. And this poem is gentle, peers into the past and the ending poses a question far greater than the subject matter. I liked Whitman's poems of his wartime experiences; his "Leaves of Grass" I found no desire to read through. And so I must leave it to others to study his actual contributions to poetry. "love without boundaries" is heartily one thing, sex without boundaries is vastly another; and many, many gay people would hold to the first, but not to the second. Your poem has depth in meaning, and as usual for your writing, depth in imagery and thought. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incantation Posted April 5 Author Share Posted April 5 Thanks Written for contest I'm not gay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terry A Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 Best of luck in the contest! As to your second point, it never crossed my mind. I have a friend who adores Hart Crane and it most certainly isn't because he is gay; Hart Crane was, but he isn't. Poets take from life, all range of subject matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.